2026 Nuffield NZ Farming Scholarship. Apply by 17 August 2025. Read More...

Apply for 2026 Nuffield NZ Farming Scholarship by 17 August 2025. More details...

Hamish Marr: Global Focus Programme

Hamish Marr, Nuffield Schoilar 2019

Singapore – Japan – Indonesia – France – Canada – United States

Hello Nuffield family,

Having just finished six weeks of GFP travel through Singapore, Japan, Indonesia, France, Canada and the United States there is so much to think about and say, so many emotions, so many memories and so much information. 

To echo those that have gone before, it is exciting, busy, hard work, the time of my life and a real honour to travel the world as a Nuffield Scholar, the places visited and the opportunities afforded are exactly what we were told but did not necessarily believe.  Prior to the GFP I had spent a month in the United States on my own and I was in a great head space for travelling and excited about everything that lay ahead.  The time spent prior taught me some valuable lessons about engaging with unknown people and how to get the most out of every opportunity  along the way.  One key thought for me throughout has always been that the only stupid question is the one you didn’t ask.

Singapore

Our GFP started with two groups of ten scholars in Singapore for three days.  Having met each other at the CSC in Ames, Iowa in March, I think we were all eager to catch up with each other and it was great way for our tour to start.  Two days of formal meetings gave us much insight not only into Singapore itself but also a good overview of how the economy and trade works in Southern Asia.  It is no accident that Singapore is the powerhouse it is, successive governments have recognised that the relatively small size of the country make it incredibly reliant on others for survival and they have used this to their advantage by staying a neutral player in the politics of the region and attracted other countries to use them as a brokering base.  It seems that most multinational companies and countries have an office in Singapore.

Japan

From Singapore we flew to Japan for ten days where we spent time in the North Island of Hokkaido, around Tokyo and in the southern Island around the city of Miyazaki.  The Japanese are very particular about the food they eat and it can be seen everywhere in the quality of the food.  As a country they depend on imports for 60% of their food and the first assumption is that local agriculture would be in a strong position. 

However we were interested to find out that the truth was very different.  Ageing farmers and no replacements is agriculture’s biggest problem. The average age is 68 and they work farms with an average size of 1.2ha. Current estimates have abandoned farm land at around one million ha. 

Japan agriculture is controlled by a farmer co-operative and it is the biggest lobby group in the country and the biggest influencer in government.  They have control of the entire value chain including finance and have even a funeral division. What was interesting was to see first hand what was set up to help farmers is now crippling them by stifling innovation and guaranteeing those that don’t break even.  There are of course exceptions and exact numbers were hard to get but Waggu beef for example can gross as farmer between $12-$15,000. 

Japan was the first chance for our group to establish itself as a team of people rather than a group of individuals.  Ten days in a country where English is not spoken at all certainly ensured we learned how to get along quickly with each other as even the simple things in a foreign country require trust and teamwork.  Culture and traditions are very important to the Japanese people.  It is remarkable for a country with the population it has to be so ordered and clean.  It is very noticeable in public how quiet the people are and it is a real contrast to other parts of the world.  The country does appear to be in decline, an ageing population and a declining population can be seen everywhere and there is a feeling of tired infrastructure

Indonesia

From Japan we flew to Indonesia and had two nights in Jakarta.  Where Japan was civilised, quiet and clean, Indonesia was everything but.  Comparing the two countries almost everything is the opposite, where in Japan trains travel at 300km/hour, in Indonesia it took five hours to travel 135kms by bus.  This is classic example of how difficult the logistics of business can be especially in such a populace place.  Geography is a major hurdle to growth, the country has over 17,000 islands, 8000 of which are inhabited.

Chaos reigns in Indonesia, there are 77 million motorbikes registered and at times its as if they all on the road at once.  Indonesia is very much a developing country and is recovering from years of political corruption and one quote we were given is that loyalty is only as good as hunger and it is clear to see the years of neglect.  In many respects the country is third world with many people living a subsistence life and the farmland is dominated by very small holdings of land worked by people with no mechanisation other than a motorbike. 

Rice is a very big crop and a staple diet.  The intricate network of small fields and the water channelling systems maintained over generations was great to see and one of the highlights of Indonesia.   It was fascinating to see amongst the chaos and subsistence farming operations big feed lots, a new 5000 cow dairy farm with plans for a second and a shrimp and rice factory producing over fifty lines of food items and exporting them around the world.  As an interesting contrast, the population generally are very poor but they all have smartphones including the children.  An amazing example of scale and how it can effect supply price. 

Indonesia is a very complex and a very religious country, the call to prayer can plainly be heard at times through out the day and the girls in our group were warned several times about covering their legs.  The scenery is quite something, every square meter of available land is used for farming including near vertical hill sides.

France

Our next stop was a week in France including a day off in Paris which we all put to good use by seeing the sights and a week later we flew out of Toulouse in the south.  For me France is all about tradition that has been in place for generations.  Tradition that sees their farming and their food system relatively unchanged because the demands of the consumer haven’t changed.  Fresh bread every day, cheese, coffee, wine and meat and two hour lunches dictate the terms in France. 

It was interesting to be there pre Brexit. The French people are of the opinion that the EU imposes too many rules but the common trade and open border policy has many benefits that outweigh leaving.  There is much to be admired by the attitude of the French and their work life balance seems to be ingrained in their psyche.

Nova Scotia, Canada

From France we went to Nova Scotia and of all the places we visited it was not what I expected at all.  When you think of Canada you think big scale, Nova Scotia was quite the opposite.  The province is almost an island and as such has a very maritime climate but it is far enough north that it has very cold winters. It is a land of many lakes and is over 70% tree covered.  We encountered very small scale farming, dairy, beef, horticulture and fishing.  In the case of dairy farming it was a real step back in time, we saw cows with collars and chains around their necks that are milked side by side in free stalls at ground level.  We also had a visit with Dairy Farmers of Nova Scotia, the governing body in the province and among other things had an explanation of supply management and quotas. 

From the outset Canada does not wish to export any dairy product due to trade obligations of other commodities and it produces only enough for itself and here the supply management system is born.  To discourage over production the farmer price is set at breakeven point for the 50th percentile of farmers.  We were told that this system is the envy of the world however our very quick conclusion was that from the outset the system that the farmers support sets 50% of them up to fail and ultimately stifles progress and innovation.

Horticulture is a big industry in Nova Scotia and we spent a lot of time looking into it and it is a success story due to some very clever marketing by the farmers.  Some years ago, two Nuffield scholars and many others organised themselves to each specialise in a particular crop and pool the produce as a way to minimise internal competition from the supermarkets.  The biggest surprise from Nova Scotia was wild blueberries.  This native plant grows wild anywhere the forest has been cleared and they are grown on a huge scale, the industry is 80,000 hectares plus in the province alone and worth around $80 million annually. 

We were billeted out with Nuffield Scholars for four nights in Nova Scotia, I stayed with Richard Melvin, a scholar in the 70’s and his wife Jaqueline.  They arranged meetings of various groups and organised a farmers dinner for our group at a state park in which I gave an address on the history of the Nuffield Scholarship and what we were seeing around the world as a way to inspire some young farmers to think about applying.

Washington DC, United States

From Canada we went to Washington DC for three days including one day off.  If ever there was a city worth visiting, Washington DC has it all and it explains some of my thoughts about the patriotism of the American people.  The district of Columbia that houses all the government is full of amazing buildings, monuments and gardens and is very grand.  The national museums are all incredible dedications to history of this very proud nation.

A highlight of our time in Washington DC was meeting the other GFP group and seeing that they had also developed into a very tightknit unit and clearly all enjoyed each others company.  We spent two days in meetings with the USDA, Bayer, Syngenta, the Australian embassy and Senator Chuck Grassley from Iowa who gave us forty minutes of his time. 

The American political system is very complicated and is near impossible to understand but the country is such a powerhouse that its political system should probably reflect that.  Every country we visited was worried about the trade war with China and the US and where it would end.

West Virginia, United States

Our last week together was spent in West Virginia which upon reflection is not a wonderful state to be farming in.  The landscape is dominated by 75% Oak and Maple Forest and the terrain is very mountainous.  As a result the state is not known for its agricultural output but we did look at a large amount of operations and industry thanks to West Virginia University Extension Service and the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.  The NRCS will subsidise a lot of on farm improvements if they are deemed to benefit the environment, fencing, water systems, wintering sheds for cattle, handling facilities etc and we looked at some of these projects.  One shock was most farmers in West Virginia work off farm, and growth is not on the radar at all.  The shale gas industry is a very big player and has artificially inflated prices of land.

In every country we visited the lack of young people entering agriculture was a big concern.  In Japan, West Virginia and to a lesser extent Nova Scotia, there is a lack of farmers in general, land sitting idol and wasted potential.  Young people everywhere look at farming as a life of committed hard work and a salaried job in the city is a more enjoyable existence.  The three mentioned places appear to be grappling with tradition and struggle with the concept of simply trying something else. 

In Japan the successful farmers have broken away from the overarching co-op and selling direct to market.  We saw very small dairy farms in Canada (less than 60 cows) that were very defensive of the same quota system that is holding them up from expansion.  In West Virginia I gave a talk to a group farmers and politicians on our final night there about what we had seen and how to make farmers profitable and attract young people.  My answer was polite but blunt, to be successful you must be clear on your business intent, intent breeds good decisions and good decisions result in good outcomes, try new things, ask for help, focus on the basics. 

For young people to get involved it needs to be attractive to them.  It was tricky to be tactful but it seemed to our group that the USDA in its kindness is subsidising the status quo and similar to the quota system stifling farmers own ability to innovate.  Everywhere we have been the very successful people are the ones that have the courage to look critically at what they are doing and make changes as required.

There is no hiding from the word environment, with the exception of France and West Virginia we encountered very little action or even discussion on anything to do with soils, water or the climate.  West Virginia was the only place where conservation was considered as important.  It is easy to be defensive of what we do in New Zealand but I think we do very well in this space and we will continue to improve.  In terms of climate change France was the only country visited that is doing anything about it and that was via EU regulation, as far as we could tell it is not on the radar of many people although extreme weather is a frequent talking point.

The six weeks of GFP was so much more than I hoped it could be for so many reasons and I have so many memories of places and people.  Our group went from 10 individuals to a very tight group of organised and cohesive people.  I think we all come away from the shared experience with a huge amount of knowledge not just about agriculture but about ourselves and the need for empathy for those around us. 

We also need to constantly clarify what we are doing and the directions we are going in. 

To move forward in business and in life the big take home from me from the GFP is understanding your why, why are we farming? Why are we growing, what we are growing? Why are we living where we live?  The successful farmers and business people we visited around the world clearly new the answers to these questions and were driven as a result of that simple question, why?

As an ambassador for New Zealand over the past six weeks it is incredibly humbling to be told a lot about how great our country is, even by people who have never been but want to.  It is hard to fathom how we manage to pull our weight on the international stage as much as we do considering the distance to markets and the machine that is international agriculture and trade.  The entire food system is very complex and is so different between and even within countries. 

For New Zealand to continue to prosper we need to be ever mindful of our image to our customers overseas.  We can be leaders environmentally without effecting production or farmers livelihoods as long as we strive to be better tomorrow than what we are today and not being afraid of making mistakes while making progress. 

I have been extremely proud to travel as a New Zealander in a group of nine others and we have been to some amazing places and seen some amazing things together.  I couldn’t have asked for a better group of people to be travelling with and I have made nine lifelong friends I am sure.

At the very forefront of all of our learnings and what my Nuffield experience has taught me is the importance of three things in our industry. Agriculture, Food and People: For agriculture to prosper we must embrace the needs of the people we are producing the food for and they should be in the forefront of everything we do.   I come home from my time away very grateful to have been given the experience, keen for more and very proud to call myself a Nuffield Scholar.

Follow Hamish Marr on Twitter @MarrHamish

Read the rest of the Global Focus Programme reports:

Click here to go back to the newsletter.

Corrigan Sowman: Global Focus Programme

California – Argentina – Chile – Italy – United Kingdom

Hello Nuffield family,

great to be sharing some insights with you all again. 

When I last spoke to you at the conclusion of the CSC in Iowa, my reflections centred around New Zealand’s place as a nimble food producer.  I felt that our story around our culture, our taonga tuku iho (heritage), our environment, the safety of our food, our nutrition and our manufacturing skill to differentiate were a key strength.

Over the following 40 days, I joined 7 other fantastic scholars from Australia, Zimbabwe, Brazil, UK and The Netherlands to travel through 5 countries.  We started in the San Joaquin Valley (The Valley!) of California, then to Buenos Aires and drove through the grain growing heartland to Rosario along the Parana River.  We jumped the Andes to Santiago, Chile, starting in the drier north we travelled through horticulture central finishing in the forestry and cropping region around Temuco. 

A change in hemisphere and continent bought us to Italy, where we begin our food journey in Turin before driving south via Milan to the mountainous Abruzzo region and then on to the historic city of Rome.  Finally, we flew to the UK and started our week on the Fens in Lincolnshire, travelled south to Somerset, around Wessex finishing back in London for a first-hand look at Extinction Rebellions protests at Westminster, London.

Climate

The first common trend across almost every farm or business visit we had is that the climate has changed and growers are struggling to adapt.  Primarily the change is expressed as more variable rainfall with much more intensity when it does occur.  Only in a few cases were there plans in place to adapt, most are on the back foot with varying degrees of acceptance as to how permanent the change is.  Infrastructure to compensate for the changes doesn’t exist in many cases.  My conclusion – expect supply volatility everywhere.

GM

Secondly there seems to be two very strong positions around GM, one is accepting and has embraced it fully for production gain.  The other is firmly of the opinion that the market doesn’t reward GM, it simply adds yield but no additional profit to the grower and locks the production system into the control of multinationals licensing the tech. My conclusion – GM has not substantially rewarded the grower in most cases I saw. 

Biologicals

There are however exciting prospects around the understanding of soil biology and integrated pest management with biologicals.  We saw strong recognition that we are just beginning to explore what opportunities exist to improve the biological performance of our soils and reduce our reliance on synthetic chemistries.  This is a trend that I don’t think will go away. 

Nutrition

The US and South America are firmly focused on feeding the world.  Nutrition is becoming a more common word but not ahead of yield yet.  Mostly it’s commodity, commodity, commodity.  If we produce more, we will win is the mentality.  My conclusion – NZ has significant relevance in nutrition, it has limited relevance in competition on supply.  It is also clear that manufacturing IP brings nutrition opportunities to the fore.  Giving up ownership of manufacturing is at our peril.  I saw very limited examples of value chains with grower ownership and control like I see in New Zealand.

There is strong social pressure for sustainable farming practices felt by all growers.  This is irrespective of the economy being stable or unstable politically or economically.  That surprised me. In most cases from what I have seen the NZ grower seems to be light years ahead in this space with demonstrable data.  My conclusion – we can prove our story; many others can only pay lip service.  The greatest place the NZ grower can add product value inside the farm gate is through verifiable attributes that sit behind how the product is produced.

Christchurch terror attack

Lastly, we were abroad during the 15th March Christchurch terror event.  This afforded us the opportunity to see the response through the eyes of the international community.  What shone through during this difficult period was our value in humanity, the moral code that most New Zealanders live by.  What I can now reflect on is the way many from around the world view New Zealand.  We are deeply respected and admired for doing the right thing because it is simply the right thing to do.  Our food is New Zealand food, not New Zealand milk or meat or apples, its New Zealand food. Anytime that any of us interacts with our global customers, we represent all of us.

Values, quality, heritage

For many of you this probably hasn’t been anything overly new, but it really cements for me where we should play and where we shouldn’t as a country and with my own vested interest in the dairy industry.  The most successful multi-generational businesses I visited are very clear on their values, absolutely focused on quality, constantly relating what they do to their heritage and are telling the consumer about it. They all have a culture that constitutes excellence, their strategy is an outcome of this culture, they are clear on vision.

It is extraordinarily hard to articulate after one week back in New Zealand what I witnessed in my 8 weeks abroad.  But one thing is clear to me.  A united New Zealand food story, premised by action not words, vested in a short value chain owned from grower to customer and differentiated through food science based on nutrition, provides us a bright future.  Let’s be clear on our why and very smart in our ability to pivot around that.

Kind regards

Corrigan Sowman


Follow Corrigan Sowman on Twitter @gbdairylad


Follow the links below to read the rest of the Global Focus Programme Reports from 2019:

Click here to go back to the newsletter.

Andrew Watters: Reflections from the Chair

Andrew Watters, Nuffield New Zealand Chair

We have a dichotomy in New Zealand agriculture at present. On the one hand we have favourable economic conditions with good prices for most of our products, a very favourable exchange rate and record low interest rates. And yet despite this, farmer confidence is flat, reflecting increasing government regulation, uncertainty in general business confidence and uncertainties in the dairy sector.

We are clearly undergoing a paradigm shift that is affecting agricultural production systems. We are being forced to face some of the externalities of farming; the need to address nutrient loss and greenhouse gas emissions. And at the same time, agricultural markets are changing with new groups of consumers willing to focus their purchase decisions on environmental and animal welfare attributes which determine food as ‘good food’ and ‘bad food’.

A step change in approach to water quality was delivered by Minister David Parker and supporting ministers as your trustees met in Wellington to complete our shortlist for 2019 scholar selection. And class 40 from the Kellogg program were also right in the thick of it with their stage two module involving meetings with NGOs on both sides of the debate and the Minister of Agriculture.

I think at heart, most farmers and growers are individuals who highly value discretion and
relatively unfettered decision making, and this is being challenged.  For some of us, our economic future is also being challenged. 

The conclusion of at least the Kellogg attendees was that farmers are not going to be able to change the tide; the change is now inevitable. 

As farming leaders with broad and long-term perspectives, Nuffield members have a unique opportunity to help our Agri-food industries to form a positive vision and
action plan for the future.  This will involve land use change, ever a feature of the New Zealand landscape.  It will involve planning, monitoring and new management practices and systems.  It will require our co-ops and other exporters to develop and foster new value chains.

Perhaps the opportunity is for us to ensure the requirement for regulation and change is
leveraged to support our position as food producers with products which have
unique attributes and a unique story.  We know that such an approach requires assurance and that our ‘good food’ needs to be traceable.

We know intrinsically that we produce food as sustainably and naturally as anyone, yet
we can’t take our position for granted.  Grain-fed beef produced in feedlots is being dubbed ‘bad’ by millennial consumers yet the impossible burger with circa 20 ingredients including GMO is ‘good’.  Let’s ensure that our position stands scrutiny and we can achieve win-win outcomes.

There is a section in this ENUFF about the Nuffield 2020 triennial – an important event in your 2020 calendar.  Thanks are extended to Michael Taylor and his committee for their excellent work.

Your trustees were pleased to consider 20 applicants for the 2020 Nuffield Scholarships which we have shortlisted to 10 interviewees.  We have six women, four men, a dominance of farmer/grower applicants and good coverage across dairy, sheep and beef, viticulture and horticulture. 

The next time we write will be to inform you of the successful applicants.

Click here to go back to the newsletter.

Sophie Stanley – Enthusiasm for a digital future

Enthusiasm for a digital future key asset for Dairy Women’s trustee role 
1 July 2019

Enthusiasm for a digital future is a key asset Auckland based tech enthusiast Sophie Stanley feels she can bring to the Dairy Women’s Network as the newest member of its trust board.

“I’ve worked with the Dairy Women’s Network in the past and have always admired what they are doing in the community to support women in the dairy industry,” she said. “I thought it was an organisation I could add a lot of value too and opportunities like this don’t come along that often.”

Stanley, 32, felt her youth and enthusiasm for a digital future was the key asset that she would will bring to the role.

“Having lead an agtech company in the US for the last two years I bring experience from the technology sector with agile and design thinking, and also have international experience working with farmers in the Midwest, USA.”

She said her experience travelling as a scholarship recipient of the prestigious rural leadership programme Nuffield New Zealand where she researched social media in the agricultural sector highlighted the importance of community and good use of technology, but stresses the importance of face to face connections.

“Used well, technology should be leveraged to enhance knowledge, community and connection, but real human interaction remains very important.”

Chair of the Dairy Women’s Network Board of Trustees Cathy Brown said Stanley had a strong understanding of strategy development and execution.

“Her digital knowledge will be an asset as the Dairy Women’s Network tells the story of the amazing women who work in the industry. We look forward to having Sophie on the team,” she said.

Stanley spent a year as an Associate Director on the Rural Leadership Consortium board (Nuffield NZ) following travelling overseas and has worked extensively in the banking and technology sectors.

“I feel excited to join a team who are committed to enabling transformational change in agribusiness, particularly with women,” she said.

“The agricultural sector has long been a passion of mine, and I believe that grassroots organisations such as Dairy Women’s Network provide so much value to its members by providing a community and access to tools and knowledge that can help them thrive.”

With strong rural roots resulting from growing up on a sheep and beef farm in Rangitaiki, in the Bay of Plenty, Stanley has always had a strong passion for agriculture and food production. She graduated from Massey University with a Bachelor of Science (Agricultural Science) and Bachelor of Business Studies (Economics) and went on to spend five years working as an Agri Manager for ANZ Bank with dairy farmers in Morrinsville.

In 2013 when she won the Nuffield Scholarship to research the impact of social media in agriculture she was one of the youngest scholars to ever be awarded it.

She joined cloud software company Figured in 2014 to build the vision for a cloud based agri accounting software, spending four years helping grow the company that included moving to Omaha, Nebraska to launch the business in the United States.

The call of New Zealand’s beaches and mountains saw her return home earlier this year to take up a role working on building app partner programmes for the global ecosystem at Xero.

An avid reader, podcast listener and traveller who says she loves learning about food systems, politics, economics and climate change, she has found time to run her first 50 kilometre ultramarathon in February and is training for her next ultramarathon in Taupo in October.

Stanley’s first Dairy Women’s Network Trust Board meeting will be in September.

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU1907/S00023/enthusiasm-for-a-digital-future.htm

KPMG – Research and Development National Seminars

The government has introduced a Research and Development (“R&D”) Tax Incentive, to support and further promote R&D in NZ businesses.

The R&D Bill has passed its first reading in Parliament and we expect legislation to be enacted in May/June this year, allowing businesses to access, and make the most of the incentive from the start of the current tax year (typically 1 April 2019).

The incentive is a great opportunity for businesses to access support for R&D – It’s expected that over 2000 New Zealand businesses will be eligible to claim the incentive.

KPMG invite you to join one of their sessions where R&D experts will present – alongside officials from Inland Revenue, and Callaghan Innovation – on the R&D Tax Incentive, providing insight into how the incentive will provide broader access to R&D funding for New Zealand businesses.

The seminar will also cover what is, and what isn’t R&D, and how to start planning early to be ready to make a claim for this year’s R&D activities.

As well as KPMG, officials from Inland Revenue and Callaghan Innovation will be on hand to answer any of your questions on the new incentive in the Q&A section of the seminar.

https://communication.kpmg.co.nz/23/539/landing-pages/rsvp-blank-eda-blinc-hosted.asp

General Manager Update: Anne Hindson, April 2019

This update for December through to April summarises the activities of NZRLT which is the operational arm of both Nuffield and Kellogg programmes.

With the recruitment period for 2020 Nuffield scholars and the 2020 Kellogg programmes about to kick off, word of mouth and encouragement from those who have completed the programmes are still the prime drivers of quality and diverse applicants so we hope you will all take time to approach some emerging leaders and encourage them to apply for these life changing experiences.

The 2019 scholars announced in the November E Nuff are well into their programme having undertaken a two day NZ briefing in early December which enabled the group to bond, be briefed by industry and government on global activities and priorities and put into practice some of the research and reflection tools provided by Hamish Gow at their November orientation.

In January the group opted to do a 1.5-day leadership workshop with the Course 39 ‘Kelloggers’ providing further tools and new understanding of their own and others leadership styles and how to operate as a team. The combined tools were well utilised at the Contemporary Scholars Conference where the NZ scholars were sharing and coaching other international scholars on these tools.

This April E Nuff provides the five scholar reflections on their CSC experience and the 5-day tour & business visits the group undertook between Chicago and Des Moines in Iowa which was the location for the 2019 CSC.

Meanwhile the 2018 scholars reports are just released after scholars spent the summer working on their draft and incorporating the feedback received.  There is a lot of industry interest in the reports with requests for copies and speakers at industry events. As mentioned by Andrew, we are looking at how we leverage these leading insights and learnings together with our alumni to start making a difference.

Nuffield2020 is a huge undertaking for the organisation and the hardworking committee with four events over 11 days. It will be vital that NZ alumni support this event as country hosts but also in generating interest by encouraging year cohorts and GFP groups to combine the event with a group reunion but the invites and suggestions need to get out now!.

Having just attended the two day Grow 2019 Boma conference in Christchurch, with a few of our  organising committee we have reflected on the content and focus of the one day Summit as a key component  of Nuffield2020, and particularly ways to to differentiate it from other industry conferences. With the event open to Kellogg alumni and industry it is an opportunity to gain greater exposure for NuffieldNZ.

The website has just been updated with more details on the different events under Nuffield2020 so check out on https://www.nuffield2020.com/

Noting other NZRLT activities, The Kellogg Rural Leadership Programme continues to attract high quality applicants and deliver great networks, friendships and leadership skills on farm and in industry forums and businesses. It is great to see the Kellogg alumni now in government  (5 in total) and their willingness along with Minister O’Connor to share experiences with the group.

In June, the 40th course of Kelloggers will be welcomed onto the programme and this is a major milestone for the programme. The cohort will receive different content to those who undertook the first programme in 1979, reflecting the new leadership environment and skills needed but the fundamental principles of the programme remain the same.

On the management front, in May we regretfully farewell Clara Sweetman who has been our Marketing and Comms Contractor for the last 12 months as her family move to Auckland. We are actively recruiting a replacement for the role along with a newly created Event/Project Coordinator role to help with regional seminars etc.

With the NZRLT financial year running between 1 April & 31 March we are just wrapping up the 2018-19 year financials and the Board & I have been reviewing our strategy and new alumni initiatives as we plan for the next twelve months.

Chair Update: Andrew Watters

Andrew Watters, Nuffield New Zealand Chair

Andrew Watters, Chair of the Board
April 2019

The Trustees held our second Board meeting of the year last week (early April) to address ‘business as usual’ matters focused on running two high quality leadership development programmes as well as the strategic development of the organisation. 

The New Zealand Rural Leadership Trust (NZRLT) is the operational entity with the Nuffield New Zealand Farming Scholarship Trust (NFST) now operating as a capital fund for the future reinvestment in Nuffield Farming Scholarships.

Nuffield Scholars at our biennial meetings can elect two (existing or new) trustees to make a total of four Nuffield appointed Trustees, with two independent appointees appointed by our National Advisory Committee made up from our investor partners. We also have an associate Trustee appointed from recent Nuffield scholars.

I reference this because under the Charities Act we must hold our ‘annual’ meeting every year, with the proposed date for the 2018 financial year being Friday 10 May 2019. We will conduct the meeting by a zoom video-conference invite.  During the meeting we will cover off the normal requirements, including the 2018 year-end financial position with the NFST. As requested at last year’s AGM we will provide you with an update on the financial situation with the RLT and we will also provide updates on Nuffield International, the 2020 Triennial, and our Rural Communities project.

As part of the AGM we will provide some feedback on the ‘one kitchen two restaurants’ concept developed five years ago – that saw the NZRLT be formed and take over the operations of both the Kellogg and Nuffield programmes in June 2017. The analysis shows that Kelloggs has been a great contributor to the financial performance of the NZRLT, which in turn has enabled us to improve and extend the Nuffield Scholarship programme.

As a reminder, our two programs are as follows:

Nuffield:

  • Develop emerging producer (farming) leaders by fast tracking their leadership pathway through GLOBAL exposure & learning
  • Equip scholars to analyse and untangle wicked /complex problems, thereby enabling effective provide producer input into decision making
  • Experiential learning with the tools to maximise opportunities available
  • High quality research project and global insights delivered to partners, farmers /growers and industry

Kellogg:

  • Providing the ideas, capability, motivation and skills to “enable” and empower leaders who can collaborate across sectors and geographically.
  • Providing the tools, skills, and pan sector understanding of NZ AGRIFOOD sector
  • Creating networks/friendships across sectors and country
  • Applying & demonstrating critical analysis, design thinking, strategic analysis, problem /opportunity solving
  • Transferable skills being Collaboration, Creativity and Communication
  • Kelloggs is an ideal pathway development programme into the Nuffield scholarship although candidates can successfully enter the Nuffield program directly.

As the NZRLT our unique proposition as an organisation is:

  • Experiential learning focus and global exposure (Nuffield)
  • The combined Kellogg and Nuffield alumni
  • Our proud and successful history with a positive view of change
  • Our insightful reports
  • Our pan sector representation and national reach

Craige Mackenzie and Anne Hindson attended the recent CSC programme in Iowa in the US. It is pleasing to see our five scholars standing out as a group with their enthusiasm, team work and work ethic. They were well prepared and showed their capability and potential.

Craige represents New Zealand on the international board with the current focus on the financial sustainability of the organisation and delivering on current international scholar commitments. Nuffield International has important goals to extend Nuffield beyond the Commonwealth countries but is still in start-up mode.

Michael Tayler and his able team are making excellent progress on planning for the 2020 Triennial. The combination of the Nuffield New Zealand conference, the Agri-business Summit and the Nuffield 2020 Triennial (10 days from 20 March to 29 March, plus technical tours) makes this job a massive feat to organise with the resources of one contractor, volunteers and some support from NZRLT. We hope all our alumni will take on the host role and be part of the full programme.

Whilst we plan to update you on strategic matters at the AGM, our short-term focus is on building our potential pipeline of people (with an emphasis on farmers and growers) considering our two programmes. To that end we are to repeat our successful regional meeting initiative from 2017 to attract new potential applicants. This time the meetings will be open to both Kellogg and Nuffield applicants; we intend to utilise the meetings, to showcase our best scholars and to discuss the potential Rural Communities project. Our initial focus for meetings is Northland, Bay of Plenty, Hawkes Bay, top of the South, Central Otago and Southland. The NZRLT team may be in touch for suggestions and ideas for these meetings.

We look forward to a good discussion at the AGM on May 10th at 12.00pm!

Nuffield Triennial Conference Update: Michael Tayler

The last six months has been a very busy time for our Triennial Nuffield 2020 committee. With now only around 15 months until we have delegates arriving for our conference, we are very aware we still have a lot to do.  

Our aim is to produce a world-class conference that will showcase New Zealand’s innovative and leading edge agri-food sector. Highlighting Maori agriculture and demonstrating innovation and sustainability in our businesses. 

Some of the things we have been focusing on are; 

Communication/Marketing 

  • We have created a promotional video to be played at the individual countries conferences and will be putting another video out before registrations open 
  • We have created a basic website that we will continually add to www.nuffield2020.com  
  • We have set up social media accounts on Facebook and Twitter @Nuffield2020 and #Nuffield2020. 
  • NZ Alumni have been emailed a ‘save the date’ announcement including ways they can help 
  • International Alumni have been emailed a ‘save the date’ announcement with a program overview  
  • We have selected approximately 20 ‘Triennial Ambassadors’ from different year groups to help us promote the Triennial in their countries  

Biennial & Triennial Program 

  • Confirmed dates are:
    – Biennial  20th– 21st March 2020 
    –  Triennial 22nd-29th March 2020
    –  Technical tours 30th March – 1st April 2020 
  • We have selected catering and accommodation options 
  • We have spent time researching in the Central Otago and Canterbury regions looking at potential field trip options  
  • We have also put together a Program overview (attached: Triennial A4 Program Overview 181018). 

Sponsorship 

  • We have created a sponsorship prospectus document with insets for different levels of sponsorship 
  • Have been approaching targeted companies to become a partner of Nuffield 2020 

There is no doubt though that raising a sufficient level of sponsorship will have a key impact on our ability to put together a world-class conference so if any of the alumni have some suggestions, contacts or ideas regarding sponsorship we would welcome them. 

Finally, for our conference to be successful, we will need the help and support of our New Zealand alumni. This is a unique opportunity to show the rest of the world New Zealand agriculture at its best and we would love you to be a part of it.  

So please put 20th March – 1st April 2020 into your diaries now. We look forward to seeing you all in March 2020! 

 

Michael Tayler 

Chairman 

Nuffield Triennial 2020 

GM Update: 2018 in review

We are reaching the end of a busy year for Rural Leaders and our two programmes – the Nuffield Scholarships & the Kellogg Rural Leadership Programme.  While we have tried to make this a year a time of some consolidation after the launch of the new organisation and branding and the increased responsibilities, the projects and opportunities keep arising and enthusiasm from a busy management and governance team keeps emerging!

For this last E Nuff of 2018, I would like to give an overview of the highlights and achievements of the organisation and the programmes for the year which has involved the contribution of a larger team as highlighted below. 

2018 Highlights/Achievements  

Marketing  

  • Launched new branding (logo & applications) for Rural Leaders and Kellogg programmes & Refreshed the Nuffield brand to modernise and be consistent with the branding of Rural Leaders as the organisation
  • Launched a new website hosting both programmes and Rural Leaders with multiple entry points 
  • Appointed a part-time marketer – Clara Sweetman to drive our marketing activities
  • Increased significantly the media coverage and exposure of Kellogg & Nuffield projects supported by our media partnerships 
  • Had at least 5 alumni featured in On Farm Story with David Kidd starring on a Country Calendar episode. 

Financial & Sponsorship  

  • Re-signed four of our programme partners for a further period – thank you for your support Farmlands, Zespri, Hort NZ, FAR 
  • Bought onboard new Service & Media partners with KPMG, NZ Farming Life (Dairy Exporter & Country Wide) and Global HQ (Farmers Weekly & Dairy Farmer) 
  • Introduced new accounting and reporting systems as required under the Charities Act, with the support of our KPMG partner. 

Governance  

  • Farewelled and thanked Chair Juliet Maclean for her exceptional leadership and contribution to the big changes introduced, particularly the new branding. 
  • Welcomed James Parsons on to the board as Nuffield appointed Trustee 
  • Recruited, after a robust selection process, a new independent Board member, Louise Webster who will start the role in January (click here for more info on Louise) 

Programmes  

Nuffield 

  • Hosted a Nuffield International GFP New Zealand leg in Hawkes Bay and Bay of Plenty in April 
  • Delivered a fantastic, well supported Nuffield NZ Biennial Conference in Tauranga in May, thanks to Dave Hurst and his team  
  • Discussed and debated high quality presentations from the 2016 & 2017 Scholars.  
  • Selected five high quality 2019 scholars (see their profiles in this E Nuff)  
  • 2018 Scholars presented insights and debated implications for NZ to an audience of our investing partners 
  • Hosted the 2019 Nuffield Awards with over 75 industry guests & alumni attending  
  • Launched Nuffield 2020 Triennial event globally with a great video resource 
  • Appointed a project manager for the Triennial – Deb Gee from Higher Perspectives Consulting  

Kellogg 

  • Ran two 6 x month Kellogg programmes coordinating the involvement of over 40 industry leaders 
  • Graduated 48 new leaders within a broad diversity of sectors, geographical location, gender, age, ethnicity.
  • Published 48 new pieces of rural research for industry & public use. 

Our vision of “Growing NZ Through Thriving Rural Communities” and the achievement of the steps toward this could not be achieved without the ongoing contribution and time of the following; 

Rural Leaders Team:  Programme Coordinator Lisa Rogers, Marketing & Comms Clara Sweetman, our Kellogg programme leader Scott Champion and Project Support Patrick Aldwell & Nuffield Advisor, Hamish Gow. 

The Trustees:  Andrew Watters (Chair), Hamish Fraser, Michael Tayler, James Parsons, Craige Mackenzie, Associate Matt Hocken and Juliet Maclean (chair prior to June) 

Strategic partner representatives (National Advisory Group) 

  • Dairy NZ – Jenny Jago (prior to May – Mark Paine) 
  • Agmardt – Malcolm Nitsche 
  • Beef + Lamb NZ – Doug Macredie and Richard Wakelin 
  • FMG – Andrea Brunner 
  • Mackenzie Charitable Foundation  –  Mary Ross 

Programme Partners: Farmlands, FAR, Horticulture NZ, Zespri, MPI, TIAA  

From us all, at Rural Leaders, we wish all a great Xmas and New Year.

 

Chair Update: Andrew Watters

Andrew Watters, Nuffield New Zealand Chair

This time of the year is a busy period for trustees, selecting and presenting our 2019 Nuffield scholars.  The process is robust and involves shortlisting, referee checks and of course the interview process.  It all culminates with the announcement in the Banquet Hall of Parliament in early November. 

You will see from the profiles that we have very good hands-on farmers in this year’s selection with representation in dairy, sheep & beef, fibre, arable sectors.  It is also notable that the topics initially selected (which can change) are very outward/ market/ customer focused in recognition that the challenges and opportunities facing many sectors are more about the how and why of what we are doing on-farm than the what. 

We obtained excellent feedback from this year’s scholar announcement event.  Prior to the Awards, we had a highly valuable two-hour session engaging returning scholars and programme partners on topics and perspectives facing NZ and global agriculture.  And at the formal announcement at Parliament more than 75 people enjoyed hearing perspectives on the 2018 Scholar’s preliminary insights on their research topic which included challenges of setting environmental policy, the physical limitations of moving to low carbon energy systems, the need to optimise farm systems within environmental limits, the need for NZ agriculture to up its game on biosecurity and the opportunities for high value nutritional ingredients. 

One notable fact that we will be addressing in future selections is the lack of diversity amongst our scholar group.  We are under-represented this year in horticulture, in Maori agribusiness and in women scholars.  This isn’t an issue of selection, it is an issue of ensuring that we get a sufficiently diverse group of applicants.  We will be developing some plans to address this for the new year.  The answer is probably a mix of better engagement with our business partners and sponsors around candidate nomination and some more activity in the regions. 

Since our last Enuff, I am pleased to confirm the appointment of Louise Webster as an independent trustee.  As noted on our website, Louise brings a different skill set based around technology, innovation and leadership development.  Louise will join the Trust Board in January following a six-month sabbatical in Europe looking at the agri-food and other sectors.  We look forward to her contribution helping us ensure we remain relevant in a fast-changing world. 

I can also report on progress on the Thought Leadership or Rural Communities project.  Utilising the ‘Good to Great’ hedgehog as an organising concept, we have confirmed as a Trust that we are passionate about “Growing New Zealand through thriving rural communities”.  We are working on the other two components of the hedgehog but believe we can be world’s best at “Developing rural leaders that can solve (or untangle) wicked problems”.  And finally, we think that our real economic engine (how we secure ongoing funding) is “delivering leaders, and cost-effective solutions, that can address wicked problems” for our programme partners and sponsors. 

A wicked problem is defined as a problem that is difficult or impossible to solve because of incomplete, contradictory and changing requirements that may be difficult to recognise.  An effort to solve one aspect of a wicked problem may create other problems.
 

The trend towards commoditisation, the need to meet environmental standards, climate change, the role of genetic engineering, attracting young kiwis to work on farms are all examples of wicked problems.  Often these problems are across industry rather than within industry silos. 

As an organisation, we have limited resources so we need to crawl before we walk.  What we can do in the near term is ensure that our new scholars (Nuffield and Kelloggs) understand the wicked problem concept and can develop their topic area into an aspect that we need to solve for the future of NZ agriculture.  We then need to better leverage the post scholarship period to ensure scholars can engage with our partners and the alumni to transfer their knowledge into positive action. 

Finally, as we near the Christmas period it is important to acknowledge the work of Anne Hindson and her very small team.  They are currently fully engaged in running the Nuffield (working with 2018 and 2019 scholar groups) and Kellogg programs (class 38 just completed last week) & planning for the 2019 courses starting in mid-January and supporting the Nuffield Triennial work being done by Michael Taylor and his group.  As we move forward it will be important that we match our desire for impact with resourcing and this in-between time can be difficult to traverse.