2026 Nuffield NZ Farming Scholarship. Apply by 17 August 2025. Read More...

Apply for 2026 Nuffield NZ Farming Scholarship by 17 August 2025. More details...

K51

Time for a change? How contract milking supports the progression of NZ dairy farmers.

Executive summary

The current contract milking business model is no longer effective as a progression pathway in the NZ dairy industry. Research shows that 27% of contract milkers would be financially better off as a manager (Lee, 2024). This is an alarming amount and provides minimal incentive or ability for our farmers to progress within the industry.

Throughout the literature reviewed for this project, there is some slight variation in people’s opinions regarding contract milking and its place in the business structure. This is primarily due to publications regarding contract milking, often coming from the voices of high-level corporates and rural professionals and seldom from contract milkers out in the field experiencing the highs and lows of the contract milking business model.

For business people, who would invest significant money and time and shift their family to go into business with someone they have only met for maybe two hours? The answer is very few if any, so why are contract milkers going into business under these conditions? Therefore, this project addresses whether the current business model of contract milking is fit for purpose and how it enables progression.

The key findings from this project are;

  • There is a large skills gap for a large proportion of people taking the step to contract milking well before they are ready. To upskill, currently, the formal training available for farmers entering contract milking is unaffordable, challenging to access, and not timely according to events occurring on-farm.
  • A role that bridges the gap between a manager and a herd-owning share milker is needed. This role needs to be a win-win for all parties involved.
  • The views of farm owners, contract milkers, and rural professionals interviewed for this project are all very similar, and they feel that contract milking is a real issue in the industry that needs reviewing. The key findings of what needs to be reviewed within the current contract milking business model are:
    • a) the relationship between the farm owner and contract milker frequently breaks down due to a misalignment of values and expectations, which begins at the recruitment stage.
    • b) Contract milkers need to be paid a premium above what a manager of the same scale farm would receive to compensate for the risks involved in being self-employed.
    • c) there are many options to reward contract milkers other than monetary that supports the growth and progression of the contract milker.
    • d) the lack of legal protection for contract milkers, particularly when compared to a VOSM who is protected under the Sharemilking Act 1937. This was seen as an issue as the responsibilities of a CM and VOSM are equal, therefore, should have the same protection.
  • The critical components of a role that would benefit both the farm owner and contract milker are legal protection, the need for a premium, clarity within contracts, fair compensation, professionalisation, ownership and autonomy.
  • When looking into the business structures in the Australian dairy industry and the absence of contract milking within it, the concerns raised in relation to CM are the precise issues New Zealand’s dairy industry is having with it. For example, small unviable positions, ‘sham’ contracts, and the unclear and risk of whether the role is one of an employee or a contractor.

Just some of the recommendations made as a result of this research are to:

  • Dissolve the title and role of contract milker. Following this, there will be a blending of the good points from the current variable order sharemilking and contract milking agreements, which will help form a new role that will be more suited to the current climate of dairy farming and encourage progression and retention within the industry. Additionally, a new name for the new role will be created, which could be titled an ‘Operational Sharemilker’ or ‘Business Sharemilker’.
  • The addition of the word ‘sharemilker’ into the title of the new role is essential to ensure inclusion and coverage under the Sharemilker Act, which is a crucial piece of legislation to support both the sharemilker and the farm owner.

Ashlea Kowalski

Algeria – New Zealand – Nations turning liquid commodities into economic prosperity.

Executive summary

This report comprehensively analyses Algeria’s dairy market and its significance as a major importer of New Zealand’s dairy products, particularly Whole Milk Powder (WMP). Algeria purchased NZ$1,053,749,827 worth of New Zealand dairy products, in the year ending March 2024, positioning it as New Zealand’s second-largest buyer, of dairy products globally after China. Algeria’s demand for WMP, highlights its status as the second largest importer of this product globally. Algeria relies on milk powder imports to meet 45% of its domestic demand, due to limitations in domestic production capacity.

Algeria, the largest country in North Africa, gained independence from France in 1962, and boasts rich hydrocarbon resources, constituting 93% of its export earnings. Algeria has a population of 44-47 million, with 50% under the age of 30, underscores a youthful demographic, that drives consumption patterns and economic dynamics.

This report aims to assess New Zealand’s potential to enhance its dairy exports to Algeria, and identify opportunities for value-addition in the export process.

Methodology

A literature review was conducted to understand the Algerian dairy market. Supplemented by seven semi-structured interviews, with key stakeholders in New Zealand’s dairy industry participants, involved in trade with Algeria.

Analysis

The Algerian market relies heavily on imported dairy products, primarily whole milk powder reconstituted into milk, and other consumer-ready products. Importers operate under government quotas, issued by the Algerian Dairy Buying Agency, known as ‘Office National Interprofessional du Lait et de Produits Laitiers’ (ONIL), facilitating global tenders, including bids from New Zealand companies.

Key Findings

Algeria purchased NZ$1,053,749,827 of New Zealand dairy products year ending March 2024. Making Algeria, New Zealand’s second-largest buyer of dairy products.
Algeria is the second largest importer of Whole Milk Powder globally, importing 45% of its domestic demand due to limited local production capabilities.
Algerians consume 201kg of dairy per capita annually, significantly higher than the global average of 90kg.

Recommendations

  • Establish a local presence in Algeria through an agent to facilitate business engagements and navigate regulatory frameworks effectively.
  • Explore opportunities for value-addition beyond commodity exports by leveraging New Zealand’s expertise in Agri-tech services and food processing to provide integrated services via expertise in irrigation, genetics, milk processing, agri-tech software, et cetera.
  • Build strategic initiatives to enhance market presence and explore value-added services can further strengthen New Zealand’s position in Algeria’s dairy sector.

Sophia Hunt

Pasture-based corporate dairy farming in Zimbabwe – a concept plan.

Executive summary

Context

The market for dairy products in Zimbabwe, East Africa, and Southern Africa is growing and undersupplied. This paper investigates the dairy foods market, produces three years of financial projections, and investigates the critical success factors behind a greenfield large-scale pasture dairy operation. Investors from the New Zealand dairy industry have developed several projects worldwide, allowing relevant lessons to be used in Zimbabwe.

Aims

This study produces a concept plan for a corporate dairy farming company in Zimbabwe. It investigates the domestic and regional markets and the general business environment. The final focus is on discovering the critical success factors in developing a corporate pasture-based dairy company.

Methodology

A mixed method of interviews and secondary financial data was used to investigate the market in Zimbabwe, produce financial projections and develop an understanding of the critical success factors behind foreign direct investment into the dairy farming industry.

Key Findings

The market analysis indicates that Zimbabwe is a good country in which to develop pasture-based dairy farming on a corporate scale. The domestic milk market is in deficit, land with water is available, and the physical climate is the best in the region for pasture-based production.

The financial projects show attractive returns on capital, a substantial profit margin, and good cash flow. The returns consider the additional risk of operating in Africa, specifically Zimbabwe.

Careful choice of site, understanding of possible grass production, and the availability of supplements are vital in adapting the New Zealand pasture production system. Realistic budgets from the point of view of physical production and financial performance are essential. At the same time, leadership and an understanding of profit drivers are required from the director and farm management levels.

Recommendations

  1. The author should develop the proposal further.
  2. The author needs to identify the region of Zimbabwe in which to operate as a prerequisite.
  3. The promoter should project Conservative budgets.
  4. The promoter must find capital that fits the returns profile.
  5. A knowledgeable team must be assembled.

Rob Shaw, Robert

Understanding a future with genetic technologies in New Zealand agriculture.

Executive summary

New Zealand is at a pivotal time as genetic technologies become an increasingly important tool in global agriculture to help address issues such as food security, environmental impact, and changing consumer preferences. The current New Zealand regulatory framework in this space, the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) Act 1996, imposes stringent restrictions, effectively prohibiting the use of these technologies outside of controlled laboratory environments. However, significant advancements in the genetic technology space have outpaced this legislation. The Government is reviewing the framework with new regulations expected by the end of 2025. The proposed reforms aim to create a dedicated biotech regulator, streamline approvals, and align with international standards to enhance economic and environmental benefits.

This report examines the integration of genetic technologies into New Zealand agriculture, focusing on their benefits and risks, the regulatory changes needed, and the support required for adoption by the public and farmers. Prior to the new legislation being implemented, it is important to have a clear understanding of these benefits and risks in relation to New Zealand and our export markets, as well as understanding public perspectives. The research methodology included a comprehensive literature review and semi-structured interviews with 16 key stakeholders.

The findings highlight continued public apprehension and emphasise the need for a national dialogue to clarify the technologies’ benefits and implications. Identified potential risks include environmental impacts, unintended consequences, and export market, economic and social issues, though the
adoption of these technologies is unlikely to harm New Zealand’s export reputation.
A clear understanding of export market preferences and genetic modification (GM) product definitions is essential.

The findings emphasise the need for a robust, adaptable, trait-based regulatory system to mitigate these risks, and an initial focus on genetic technology tools that address emissions reduction and environmental sustainability in New Zealand agriculture, noting that public acceptance is likely to be higher for environmental applications than for production improvements.

Key Recommendations:

  • Engage public and stakeholders early in discussions on genetic technology regulations and use, clearly outlining associated risks and benefits.
  • Use unbiased, fact-based communication from trusted sources.
  • Focus on technologies that offer environmental, animal welfare, or consumer benefits.
  • Understand our export market perceptions and preferences.
  • Clearly define and explain the types and implications of genetic technologies for our export markets.
  • Develop adaptive regulations centred on product risk rather than process.
  • Implement technologies promptly to maintain a competitive edge.
  • Rural supplies merchants will have a role to educate and support farmers in the responsible adoption of genetic technologies.

Lisa Lunn

Is a more holistic approach to risk management and risk identification needed on Canterbury dairy farms?

Executive summary

This report examines risk management practices on Canterbury dairy farms and explores whether there is a need for the development of an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework specific to the dairy sector.

The report also identifies the supply of diesel to farms as critical to ensuring business continuity after an adverse weather event or seismic natural disaster. It studies the likelihood of an earthquake on the Alpine Fault on New Zealand’s South Island, or a tsunami caused by a rupture in the Hikurangi subduction zone off the east coast of the North Island. The report also considers the supply of diesel in New Zealand and looks at a number of factors that might disrupt the diesel supply chain.

2.1 Just some of this report’s Key Findings are:

  1. Dairy farms in Canterbury are heavily reliant on diesel generators for electricity backup, with most farms having at best a month’s supply of diesel to maintain operations.
  2. The likelihood of a significant earthquake (M8+ or more) at the southwestern end of the Alpine Fault is statistically relevant with one researcher estimating the probability of a rupture of this magnitude within the next fifty years at approximately thirty percent. In this circumstance, Canterbury’s roading and transport infrastructure is likely to be significantly compromised.
  3. Similarly, Canterbury’s ports are susceptible to both near source tsunami and distant source tsunami potentially damaging fuel import terminals at Lyttelton and Timaru.
  4. The COVID-19 pandemic and incidents like the Suez Canal blockage have highlighted vulnerabilities in international supply chains, leading to increased costs and delays for New Zealand.
  5. The closure of the Marsden Point oil refinery in 2022 has reduced New Zealand’s flexibility in fuel supply and increased its vulnerability to supply chain disruptions and global security threats.

2.2 Just some of this report’s Recommendations are:

  1. On farm – for farmers regular refilling of the diesel tank is important. Most farmers are on a regular fuel distribution route managed by their fuel supply company. Remote monitoring might also be an option for farmers who use a lot of diesel and need more regular topping up.
  2. On farm – where the well for stock water is close to the dairy shed, the pump could be run from the same electricity mains switchboard as the dairy shed to minimise the need to have a second generator to run a stock-water pump.
  3. Generation technology – farmers looking at their back-up electricity supply options could look at new generation technologies, such as PV solar and batteries, which are becoming more affordable and provide the farm with a layer of generation capacity that doesn’t rely on off-farm inputs such as diesel.
  4. AF8 and SAFER – given the high probability of a significant rupture of the Alpine Fault, it would be prudent for the New Zealand Government and local councils to continue its research and preparedness training alongside local councils and other relevant statutory bodies. Possibly, Tsunami should also be taken into account during these planning and training exercises.
  5. ERM research – there is need for further research into the topic of risk management on farm, and the need for the development of an ERM framework for dairy farms and potentially the wider farming community.

Peter Saunders

Regenerative farm blueprint.

Executive summary

Aims and Objectives
The study examines how New Zealand’s agricultural sector can integrate business strategy, regenerative design, and sustainability legislation to create regenerative farm blueprints that enhance Freshwater Farm Plans. These blueprints aim to thoroughly evaluate environmental impacts and tailor practices to individual farmers’ strengths, promoting sustainable farming methods that preserve freshwater ecosystems and support long-term ecological health, economic viability, and social well-being.

Methodology
This study included a thorough literature review to provide context on sustainable farming practices. A survey with 22 long-answer questions was conducted, divided into seven sections targeting specific aspects of sustainable farming. Insights were gathered from 161 participants in agriculture and scientific fields. Thematic analysis techniques were employed to ensure validity and gain a detailed understanding of participants’ perspectives. The goal was to triangulate knowledge between farming professionals and literature, enabling a SWOT analysis for developing the Regenerative Farming Blueprint.

Key Findings
The thematic analysis revealed several critical themes, providing valuable insights into the study’s problem:

Regenerative Practices: Mentioned 280 times, these practices emphasise holistic management principles and adaptive strategies. Participants noted benefits such as improved soil health and biodiversity but highlighted challenges like financial barriers and resistance to change.

Soil and Water Management: With 1123 mentions, this category was most frequently discussed, underscoring its critical importance. Key themes included soil health, effective water management practices, integration strategies, and significant regulatory and resource challenges. This indicates the need for targeted support and resources to overcome these obstacles.

Biodiversity: This theme, highlighted by 720 mentions, underscores biodiversity’s essential role in ecological health and farm resilience. However, challenges such as cost constraints and a lack of awareness were noted, suggesting increased education and financial incentives were needed.

Legislation and Compliance: Mentioned 177 times; this reflects concerns about regulatory impacts and the necessity for better understanding and support for compliance. This indicates more explicit guidelines and support mechanisms to help farmers meet regulatory requirements.
These findings indicate that while adopting regenerative practices has significant benefits, it also presents considerable challenges that must be addressed through targeted support, education, and financial incentives.

Just some of the recommendations for Farmers

  1. Identify Relevant Non-Financial KPIs: For comprehensive effectiveness, incorporate metrics like soil health, water usage efficiency, biodiversity, and carbon footprint into business planning.
  2. Engage Advisory Support: Collaborate with trusted advisors to implement robust non-financial reporting systems tracking sustainability progress.
  3. Provide Balanced Reporting: Include detailed non-financial reports, such as environmental impact assessments and sustainability audits, alongside financial results for a complete view of farm performance.

Just some of the recommendations for Stakeholders

  1. Engage Early with Farmers: Proactively communicate about upcoming compliance requirements and provide clear, actionable guidance to ensure early engagement and buy-in.
  2. Build Advisory Capability: Enhance advisors’ skills and knowledge through specialized training programs focused on regenerative farming techniques and sustainability practices.
  3. Use Technology Effectively: Invest in advanced technology systems, such as precision agriculture tools and digital platforms, to simplify and streamline farmer reporting processes.

Richard Pedley

Navigating genetic technology – supporting dairy farmers through regulatory reform and adoption.

Executive summary

Background
There have been significant advancements in genetic technology over the last ten years. Modern genetic technology is now more precise and capable of producing genetically modified organisms with changes similar to those that could have been achieved naturally. The world is responding to these advancements, prompting many countries to adopt more liberal and precise regulatory frameworks.

New Zealand is one of these countries and is now beginning its own regulatory reform process. New Zealand aims to use this reform to harness these technological advancements to improve agricultural productivity, sustainability, and competitiveness in global markets. However, these advancements also bring complexities and challenges that must be carefully managed through regulation and surrounding processes and mechanisms to ensure their safe and effective implementation.

Aims and Objectives
To navigate these complexities and ensure a smooth transition, this work aims to identify possible actions and strategies to support New Zealand dairy farmers as modern genetic technology becomes permissible on farms.

Methodology
This research involved a literature review and seven semi-structured interviews with dairy farmers. The literature review primarily focused on documented impacts from modern genetic technology use overseas and the actions and strategies taken to mitigate these impacts. The interviews were conducted with a range of participants, covering small- to large-scale dairy operations, and a variety of views on the use of genetic technology. The interview data was analysed using thematic analysis. These findings were compared and evaluated against the literature review to develop the key findings.

Key Findings
The data collected from the literature review and interviews were analysed and found:

  • Regulatory reform is needed to keep pace with technological advancements and meet international standards. However, consideration should be given to ensuring that regulations are not more permissive than those of our key markets.
  • Collaborative governance and inclusive decision-making are critical, particularly integrating farmers’ practical knowledge to create effective and trusted policies.
  • Farmers require effective coexistence measures and regulatory alignment with export market standards to mitigate economic impact.
  • Farmers and industry will need certainty and clarity about genetic technology’s impacts in a New Zealand-specific context.
  • Clear communication and collaboration between government, industry, and research institutions, along with robust education and training programs, are essential for effective technology adoption.
  • A gradual and controlled approach to adopting genetic technology, starting with low-risk modifications, can build knowledge, capabilities, and trust.


Recommendations for Decision-Makers:

  1. Foster collaboration and inclusive decision-making: Create a regulatory environment incorporating diverse perspectives and building public trust. Consider establishing a semi-independent body or commission to ensure all stakeholders, including farmers, scientists, consumers, and Maori, have input in the regulatory reform process.
  2. Develop coexistence measures: Work closely with stakeholder groups to develop and enforce mandatory coexistence measures such as buffer zones and isolation distances.
  3. Enhance farmer education and support: Invest in demonstration farms, early adopter programs, and robust extension services to provide hands-on training and support.
  4. Ensure clear and transparent communication: Build public and market confidence in using modern genetic technology through consistent and accurate information dissemination. This may require a unified communication strategy involving government, industry, and research institutions to clearly explain genetic technology’s benefits, risks, and regulatory requirements.
  5. Align market differentiation with export markets: Align New Zealand’s labelling and standards for GM products with those of major export markets to facilitate trade and avoid market access issues.
  6. Gradual and controlled adoption strategy: Start with low-risk applications of genetic technology, such as those with environmental or biosecurity benefits, and gradually expand to more complex modifications.

Sophie MacAskill

The opportunity for KiwiSaver investment in NZ agriculture.

Executive summary

The alignment between the long-term investment objectives of KiwiSaver and the resilience of New Zealand’s food and agriculture supply chain presents a compelling case for increased domestic investment; however, less than 2% of the $115 billion of KiwiSaver funds have been invested in New Zealand’s private markets, with even less allocated to the food and agriculture sectors.

Private domestic and foreign investors are experiencing the benefits of exposure to this asset class. At the same time, KiwiSaver providers sit idle on the sidelines to the detriment of their members and an industry that needs investment.

This research project aims to identify the barriers inhibiting KiwiSaver providers from investing in Aotearoa’s primary sector assets the impetus for this report comes from the need for KiwiSaver funds to diversify their asset bases and an awareness that significant investment in the food and agriculture sector is needed.

By understanding the current barriers, is there the opportunity to facilitate greater capital allocation from KiwiSaver providers to the primary sector and enhance the returns of KiwiSaver funds and the resilience of our agriculture and food industries?

A literature review was conducted to provide context around global investment themes in agriculture and to highlight the importance of the agriculture sector in Aotearoa. Additionally, 15 qualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted with key market participants, including fund managers, asset managers, investment managers, bankers/financiers, primary sector professionals, and industry leaders. These interviews aimed to gather direct insights and findings from those actively involved in the market, offering a practical perspective on the barriers and opportunities for KiwiSaver investment in the primary sector.

Key Findings
Analysis of the themes arising from the literature and interviews found:

  • Investment in the global food and agriculture supply chain is being influenced by the steadily increased interest from large institutional investors
  • Domestic institutional investors (including KiwiSaver providers) find it challenging to make an investment case for primary sector assets over and above other asset classes
  • The need for daily pricing and liquidity obligations restricts KiwiSaver providers from investing in private markets
  • Investors and Investment managers recognise the opportunity for investment by KiwiSaver into the primary sectors, however, there is a lack of engagement by both parties to help bring this to a head.

Recommendations for KiwiSaver Providers and Investors

  1. Develop a specific allocation to agriculture or natural capital
  2. Advocate for a more strategic approach to Foreign Direct Investment
  3. Be open-minded to smaller transaction sizes and minority shareholdings
  4. Engage with sector experts to better understand the benefits of the sector
  5. Work with industry to develop a roadmap for agriculture investment and the role KiwiSaver can play in providing investment

Recommendation for Manager and Owners

  1. Engage with and seek to educate KiwiSaver investors on the benefits of the Agriculture sector
  2. Work with industry to develop a farmland index to benchmark returns
  3. Develop plans to become investment-ready
  4. Advocate for a more strategic approach to Foreign Direct Investment
  5. Align agribusinesses with institutional investors to facilitate successful partnerships

Wyatt Johnston

Gumboots on the ground approach to role-value in the food and fibre sector.

Executive summary

This research report explores role-value within The Food and Fibre Sector (TF&FS) in New Zealand, aiming to align traditional workplace practices with the expectations of Generation Z. Through an analysis of KPIs, salary benchmarks, and employee perspectives. The report offers strategic recommendations to redefine role-value, enhance business performance, and foster career development.

Key findings reveal a significant gap between conventional management methods and the preferences of Generation Z, emphasising clear communication, regular feedback, and personal engagement. The report integrates motivational theories to underscore their impact on job satisfaction and performance.

Focusing on KPI frameworks, enhancing communication channels, maintaining competitive salaries, and aligning roles with personal values aids in creating role-vale. Flexible work arrangements and continuous professional development are crucial for maintaining sector demands. Strategic insights aim to attract and support talent within TF&FS, contributing to sector sustainability and growth.

Recommendations:

For Businesses:

  • Schedule regular KPI reviews with SMART objectives.
  • Introduce flexible working hours, especially during off-peak seasons.
  • Train managers in supportive, flexible leadership practices.
  • Develop comprehensive training programs and career progression plans.
  • Establish regular communication channels and open forums.
  • Conduct annual salary reviews and collaborate with industry to create standards.

For Early Career Contributors:

  • Schedule frequent one-on-one meetings with managers.
  • Identify preferred feedback styles and maintain transparent communication.
  • Initiate regular KPI discussions to monitor performance.
  • Maintain records of accomplishments for performance evaluations.
  • Seek mentorship from industry professionals.
  • Set boundaries to maintain work-life balance.
  • Define personal values and goals through a purpose statement.
  • Embrace continuous learning for leadership development.

Implementing these recommendations enhances organisational effectiveness, attracts talent, and supports career growth in the dynamic Food and Fibre sector in New Zealand.

Megan Fox

The power of stakeholder engagement to establish a social licence to operate – perspectives from dairy technologies.

Executive summary

The New Zealand dairy sector constantly researches new products and technology for improved efficiency to sustainably meet growing production demands with fewer resources. The assessment of the value of innovation is no longer determined by monetary gains alone; the public perception of the innovation and its impact on the sector’s social licence to operate (SLO) are paramount in the current climate.
This project aims to bring attention to the importance of stakeholder engagement during the research and development phases of a dairy technology or product. The focus is twofold: first, what can we learn from the commercialisation of wearable technologies, and second, what perspectives and opinions do stakeholders have on genetic dairy technologies? The research question guiding this study is: How do we ensure that current and future genetic dairy technologies and products establish and maintain their social licence to deliver to their full potential?

A literature review was conducted to gain insights into the “What”: social licence to operate, by the “How”: stakeholder engagement, for the “Why”: genetic dairy technologies. The literature review also defines the background of cow wearables to demonstrate this technology’s use as a case study. Nineteen semi-structured interviews were carried out, four of which were conducted with wearable company representatives, aiming to gather qualitative data regarding companies’ product commercialisation and stakeholder engagement. The other fifteen interviews were with stakeholders investigating the SLO of four genetic dairy technologies.

The findings from the literature review and interviews showed that concerns and priorities of the New Zealand dairy industry are representative of all stakeholders in the supply chain, but awareness and perspectives on genetic dairy technologies vary widely. Stakeholders have shown a genuine interest in genetic dairy technologies and the desire to be more actively involved. The Responsible Innovation (RI) framework could be utilised to involve stakeholders in the research of genetic dairy technologies, while acknowledging the future uncertainty and risks associated with genetic research. Additionally, an independent party to promote genetic dairy technology and its SLO must be considered.

Recommendations for Research Institutes:

  • Share research projects and questions with the wider NZ sector early to create the potential for feedback. Options to do this could be as simple as a quarterly newsletter.
  • Review current stakeholder engagement practices during product development and investigate ways to build stage-gates to include reflection and opportunities to improve.
  • Build an open and responsible research platform by taking stakeholders along on the research journey – _create promoters.
  • Create a governance structure that balances the legal, economic, and social licence of genetic dairy technology post-commercialisation to ensure a desirable long-term impact on the NZ dairy sector.

Recommendations for Stakeholders:

  • Support the research and development of dairy technologies, through building networks and seeking active involvement in those technologies that have the potential to influence the SLO of your core business.
  • Build capabilities, like stakeholder groups or committees, to tackle wider SLO questions as a group of stakeholders by sharing responsibilities and perspectives.
  • Facilitate open and unbiased conversations to capture perspectives and beliefs and create collaboration opportunities.

 

Esther Donkersloot