As part of our function as National Councillors clause 25.1 of the constitution requires us to monitor the board. For all concerned this should be done efficiently and with everyone knowing what is expected to happen and when. The process should develop to a point that both parties have acceptance and respect for the work each do. The national council has to show quite distinctly, what the process is, how it has been achieved and what the results are. Shareholders have to have this sort of information, to be confident that the organisation is abiding by the constitution. Clause 25.1[b] reviewing the Board’s business plans; require a clear efficient process involving both the board and the council. The most important part of this is review. We have had workshops on this subject with suggestions of K. P.I s, scorecards, OCFAID and the like but nothing concrete has been done. Livestock Improvement must, in my view, lead the way in development of the process of Monitoring the Board. I would like the opportunity to look at alternative methods to achieving “Monitoring the Board”.
Efficient monitoring of the livestock improvement board
Download and read the full report here:
Grow. Advance. Lead.
Do the Kellogg Rural Leadership Programme.
More Kellogg reports:
How can sheep and beef farmers navigate climatic extremes in times of reduced cashflow?
This report aims to analyse how high performing farm businesses reach and sustain the levels of performance, resilience and wellbeing they do.
Read More →
The Fifth Quarter: Are Farmers Paid for This?
This report by Geoff Crawford asserts that co-products in the “Fifth Quarter” are undervalued, limiting farmers’ returns and that improved transparency, collaboration, and fair value ...
Read More →
The Path to Peat Free
This report explores sustainable alternatives to peat for mushroom farming in New Zealand, focusing on wood fiber blends to reduce reliance while maintaining yield and ...
Read More →


