As part of our function as National Councillors clause 25.1 of the constitution requires us to monitor the board. For all concerned this should be done efficiently and with everyone knowing what is expected to happen and when. The process should develop to a point that both parties have acceptance and respect for the work each do. The national council has to show quite distinctly, what the process is, how it has been achieved and what the results are. Shareholders have to have this sort of information, to be confident that the organisation is abiding by the constitution. Clause 25.1[b] reviewing the Board’s business plans; require a clear efficient process involving both the board and the council. The most important part of this is review. We have had workshops on this subject with suggestions of K. P.I s, scorecards, OCFAID and the like but nothing concrete has been done. Livestock Improvement must, in my view, lead the way in development of the process of Monitoring the Board. I would like the opportunity to look at alternative methods to achieving “Monitoring the Board”.
Efficient monitoring of the livestock improvement board
Executive Summary
Download and read the full report here:
Grow. Advance. Lead.
Do the Kellogg Rural Leadership Programme.
More Kellogg reports:
Answers Under Foot: Should soil health be our #1 sustainability goal?
This research examines NZ horticulture's views on soil health and explores opportunities to elevate it as a key measure of sustainability.
Read More →
Dairy Farmers Love Sharing Data… But There is a ‘But’
This report explores how NZ dairy farmers approach on-farm data sharing amid regulatory pressures. Farmers are rational—sharing data when trust, control, and value are assured. ...
Read More →
The Organic Sector With No More GE Free
This report by Matt Scarf investigates how ending NZ’s GE-Free status could affect the organic sector, threatening premiums, trust, and growth, while recommendations include clear ...
Read More →


