As part of our function as National Councillors clause 25.1 of the constitution requires us to monitor the board. For all concerned this should be done efficiently and with everyone knowing what is expected to happen and when. The process should develop to a point that both parties have acceptance and respect for the work each do. The national council has to show quite distinctly, what the process is, how it has been achieved and what the results are. Shareholders have to have this sort of information, to be confident that the organisation is abiding by the constitution. Clause 25.1[b] reviewing the Board’s business plans; require a clear efficient process involving both the board and the council. The most important part of this is review. We have had workshops on this subject with suggestions of K. P.I s, scorecards, OCFAID and the like but nothing concrete has been done. Livestock Improvement must, in my view, lead the way in development of the process of Monitoring the Board. I would like the opportunity to look at alternative methods to achieving “Monitoring the Board”.
Efficient monitoring of the livestock improvement board
Executive Summary
Download and read the full report here:
Grow. Advance. Lead.
Do the Kellogg Rural Leadership Programme.
More Kellogg reports:
27 and Ewe: Evaluating the Case and Appetite for Genotyping the NZ Commercial Sheep Flock
This report by Anna Vaughan evaluates if genotyping NZ ewes delivers enough genetic, market, and sustainability benefits to justify cost and adoption challenges.
Read More →
Future Proofing our workforce: Retaining the Skills for tomorrow’s growth
This report seeks to ensure that Central Otago’s horticulture industry remains robust, sustainable, and attractive to both current and future professionals.
Read More →
Dairy Diversification into Raw and Pasteurised Farm Milk Sales
This report explores the feasibility of NZ dairy farmers selling raw and pasteurised milk direct from the farm. It finds strong consumer interest and financial ...
Read More →


